<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<records xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://doaj.org/static/doaj/doajArticles.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
    <publisher>ERSA</publisher>
    <journalTitle>REGION</journalTitle>
    <eissn>2409-5370</eissn>
    <publicationDate>2026-09-14</publicationDate>
    <volume>13</volume>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <startPage>101</startPage>
    <endPage>114</endPage>
    <doi>10.18335/region.v13i2.672</doi>
    <publisherRecordId>803</publisherRecordId>
    <title language="eng">Population Density and Air Pollution: Should Incentives Be the Same Across U.S. Cities and States?</title>
    <authors>
      <author>
        <name>Yuval Arbel</name>
        <email>yuval.arbel@gmail.com</email>
        <affiliationId>0</affiliationId>
      </author>
    </authors>
    <affiliationsList>
      <affiliationName affiliationId="0">Western Galilee College</affiliationName>
    </affiliationsList>
<abstract language="eng"><p>Population concentration generates both economic 
          benefits and environmental costs through agglomeration-related 
          spatial externalities. This paper examines how 
          population density shapes fine particulate matter 
          (PM2.5) concentrations across U.S. states over 
          the period 2000–2023, conceptualizing density 
          as a structural driver of nonlinear environmental 
          externalities within regional systems. Using a 
          balanced panel of all fifty states, I estimate fixed-effects 
          models in which logged PM2.5 is modeled as a flexible 
          quadratic function of logged population density, 
          allowing coefficients to evolve over time and across 
          density regimes.
The          results reveal a convex relationship between population 
          density and PM2.5, indicating that the environmental 
          externalities of agglomeration increase at an accelerating 
          rate over much of the density distribution. However, 
          the strength of this nonlinear effect has weakened 
          over time, consistent with regulatory adaptation 
          and technological diffusion. A split-regime analysis 
          further shows that the curvature of the density–pollution 
          relationship differs systematically between low- 
          and high-density states, suggesting heterogeneity 
          in regional externality structures.
These          findings contribute to the regional science literature 
          by demonstrating that the environmental consequences 
          of population concentration are nonlinear, heterogeneous, 
          and dynamic within an advanced economy context. 
          More broadly, the results highlight the importance 
          of incorporating spatial externalities and governance 
          scale into density-sensitive regional policy design, 
          particularly in transportation investment, land-use 
          planning, and environmental regulation.</p> </abstract>
<fullTextUrl format="html">https://openjournals.wu.ac.at/ojs/index.php/region/article/view/672/version/803</fullTextUrl>
<keywords>
    </keywords>
  </record>
</records>
